Your Closest Contacts Are the Least Useful People You Know

Sponsored by

How 2M+ Professionals Stay Ahead on AI

AI is moving fast and most people are falling behind. 

The Rundown AI keeps you ahead of the curve. 

It's a free AI newsletter that keeps you up-to-date on the latest AI news, and teaches you how to apply it in just 5 minutes a day.

Plus, complete the quiz after signing up and they’ll recommend the best AI tools, guides, and courses — tailored to your needs.

Sign up to start learning.

Welcome to today's SCALIS EarlyCareers newsletter! 🚀

You already know the advice. Cold applications are a lottery, referrals convert, go work your network. Fine. So you open your contacts on a Sunday night, and then you stall out on a question nobody ever answers: which people?

What you do next is predictable. You message the four or five people you are genuinely close to, because those conversations are comfortable and you are already braced for rejection everywhere else. They say of course, send me your resume. Nothing happens. You conclude that networking does not work for you.

Networking worked fine. You just picked the wrong people, and you picked them for emotional reasons rather than structural ones.

This is one of the few career questions with a real experimental answer. Researchers at Stanford, MIT, Harvard, and LinkedIn ran randomized experiments on LinkedIn's People You May Know algorithm across more than 20 million people over five years, a window in which roughly 2 billion new connections formed and about 600,000 people changed jobs. They published it in Science in 2022, and it remains the largest causal test of who actually transmits work.

The finding is not the one on the motivational poster. Here is what it says and what to do about it tonight.

Learn AI in 5 minutes a day

You don't have to scroll every AI thread, track every new tool, or watch every demo. 

The Rundown AI breaks it all down for you — the latest AI news, tools, and tutorials in one free 5-minute email every morning. 

Trusted by 2M+ professionals at Apple, Google, and NASA.

Sign up to start learning.

3,844 BRAND NEW internship positions freshly posted today. View the full list below and start applying!

Weaker beats stronger, but only up to a point

The old idea, from Mark Granovetter in 1973, is that acquaintances matter more than close friends for finding work. Everyone quotes it. Almost nobody quotes the correction.

The LinkedIn experiments confirmed the direction and then added a wrinkle: the relationship is nonlinear. The researchers found an inverted U between tie strength and job transmission. Weaker ties do move more job opportunities than strong ones, but only to a point, past which there are diminishing returns to weakness.

So there are two failure modes, not one. Leaning on your inner circle is the first. Blasting strangers is the second. The productive zone sits between them, and almost nobody aims there on purpose.

What the middle actually looks like on your screen

You need this to be operational, not philosophical, so here is the profile the reporting on that study describes: someone you share roughly ten mutual connections with and rarely interact with.

Read that again, because it is the whole issue in one sentence. Enough overlap that you are credible to them. Little enough contact that they are standing somewhere you are not.

Go build the list right now. Open your connections and look specifically for people you have not spoken to in a year or more, who work somewhere you would consider, and who share a handful of mutual contacts with you. Former coworkers from two jobs ago. People from a past team who moved on. Someone you did a project with in 2023. That is the list. It will feel like the wrong list, because every name on it is slightly awkward. The awkwardness is the signal that they are not in your bubble.

Your close contacts know exactly what you know

There is a mechanical reason your best friend cannot help you, and it has nothing to do with willingness.

Close ties overlap with you. They know your industry, your former employers, your professional circle, and largely the same openings you have already seen. When they hear about a role, you probably heard about it too. The information is redundant, which means the referral opportunity is redundant.

A moderately weak tie is standing in a different part of the market. They see reqs before those reqs are posted, they know which team just lost someone, and they know it because they are somewhere you are not. That is the entire mechanism. It is not about who likes you most. It is about who has information you do not already have.

Stop Drowning In AI Information Overload

Your inbox is flooded with newsletters. Your feed is chaos. Somewhere in that noise are the insights that could transform your work—but who has time to find them?

The Deep View solves this. We read everything, analyze what matters, and deliver only the intelligence you need. No duplicate stories, no filler content, no wasted time. Just the essential AI developments that impact your industry, explained clearly and concisely.

Replace hours of scattered reading with five focused minutes. While others scramble to keep up, you'll stay ahead of developments that matter. 600,000+ professionals at top companies have already made this switch.

Join them today, for free.

Ask for information, not for a job

Here is where most people torch a good contact. They reactivate a five year old relationship and open with the heaviest possible ask.

"Do you know of any openings" is a question that requires the other person to do work, produces a no most of the time, and ends the conversation. Worse, it converts a relationship into a transaction in one message.

Ask something they can answer from their chair in ninety seconds instead:

Specific, answerable, and it does not ask them to vouch for you before they have any reason to. The vouching comes later, and it comes on its own once a real conversation exists.

Run it as volume, not as a hail mary

One weak tie is a coin flip. Twenty is a strategy.

Send eight to twelve of these a week. Most will not reply, and that is expected and fine, because unlike a close friend, a mid-tier contact costs you almost nothing socially when they go quiet. Nobody is offended. Nothing is damaged.

Track it the way you track applications. If you are sending twelve a week and getting two conversations, that is a functioning channel and it is beating your cold application rate by an enormous margin. If you are sending three a week and getting nothing, your problem is volume, not the approach.

One caveat worth holding onto

That study measured job mobility, and most of the people in it were already employed and moving. If you are currently out of work, the mechanism still holds, but be realistic that your list is shorter and the individual conversations matter more.

Which is an argument for starting tonight rather than for skipping it. The names that feel slightly uncomfortable to message are the ones the data says are worth the discomfort.